пʼятниця, 19 грудня 2014 р.

“Right sector” standing for Traditional Values of Ukraine

The media have been frequently raising the question of “Right Sector”s specific attitude towards the so-called "LGBT community" these days. In order to avoid further speculations on this subject, "Right Sector" claims that it is categorically opposing the pressing of perverted ideas about human sexuality on our society. 

We clearly differentiate people who are just sick on homosexuality or suffer from other sexual deviations and task-oriented policy on promoting and legitimizing various perversions as well as destruction of traditional morality and traditional views upon a man and a family. 

Modern radical liberalism seeks to transform humankind into a biomass having previously deprived a person of national, ethnic, cultural and even sexual identity. It goes without saying that "Right Sector", based on nationalism, traditionalism, Christianity and Ukrainian values, will resist this pressure. 

There is a war in Ukraine right now. It looks as if our society had enough time to unite around the idea of the national state, protection of its independence and territorial integrity. However, the so-called "LGBT activists" are at the same time spending grants allocated to conduct their provocative activities against a person, a family, religion and a nation. Thus, they are trying to split the Ukrainian society, breeding ill blood among us and distracting people’s attention from the main issues of these days: political struggle and liberation war. Taking into account these facts, nationalist movements as well as conservative and other patriotic organizations should oppose this state of affairs. 

"Right Sector" being the military-political movement uses all its structures to resist these destructive environments and their work. We always keep in mind the fact that there is the eastern front inside of Ukraine, but let’s not forget about the fact that Ukrainian people face numerous fronts, not just an internal one!

Dmytro Yarosh: On nationalist attitude towards NATO

Now when Ukrainians continue to be imposed with vain hope of some aid given by one international predator for the fight with another one, we’d like to present our readers a brief piece of work "On the Edge of Two Worlds" (2008) by Dmytry Yarosh. 

The West, Moscow as well as the current regime can mage agreements, organize nice "talks on peace" and decide on our fate for us. However, there is hardly any benefit of this. No one will save us unless we do it ourselves. Therefore, we should not forget the words of Lesia Ukrainka [world-known Ukrainian poetess] "The one who has released himself becomes free; the one who releases his neighbor enslaves him". 

Who can name at least one fully successful military campaign of the alliance over the past twenty years? Kosovo? ... Iraq? ... Afghanistan? ... Have we forgot that the USA itself (being also a NATO base state) is one of the guarantors of Ukraine's independence in exchange for its nuclear disarmament? So what does this military-political bloc membership bring for Ukraine indeed? Yes, you are right: a new standard of living, namely, society dechristianization; complete legalization and even promotion of sexual perversions; aggressive feminism that will destroy a typical patriarchal Ukrainian family; pacifism that thrives in NATO countries turning men into silent freaks and so on. At the same time, it brings new military standards as well: army management and its structure; MIC; weapons etc. What is of the major interest of current “governors” and oligarchs of Ukraine is the military-industrial complex. Imagine, how many billions can such non-Ukrainians as Pinchuk, Akhmetov, Kolomoysky [all of them are rich Jews living in Ukraine and leading successful business there] "honestly" amass ..? 

To say more, has anyone ever thought about the fact that such an important thing as “the national security concept” is quite a structural notion? It conveys security of the titular nation, state safety and security of minorities living on the territory of Ukraine. So the question is how NATO is going to provide the most important issue - Ukrainian national security? Is it planning to do that by building its military bases on our lands? Or, perhaps, by placing its garrisons in our cities? By putting on alert defense systems? Shall we trust sweet NATO promisers who are obviously dreaming of the wealth of Ukrainian land rather than its safety, whose interests are restricted with our black earth and food resources, minerals and raw materials; seas, rivers, forests, mountains and valleys? These are the true interests of our American and European "friends". Try to refresh in your memory all the cases when the West surrendered Ukrainians to Moscow in the sake of its own interests! 

Yes, Ukraine is placed on the verge of two worlds, yes, we are a European nation, and yes, we are the carriers for a complex mission: spiritual rebirth of European civilization. But we must understand that those who rule the world today are doing their best to destroy the truth of God on earth, to make all the nations (being the work of our Lord) melt in the global pot, and, finally, to destroy the system of God’s values , which has led the humanity through ages. In this context I take both Moscow and Brussels as the union. 

July 5th, 2008 

неділя, 2 листопада 2014 р.

The activists of "Right Sector" made an opposition event to the bugger gathering that toke place in "Kinopanorama", Kyiv cinema

The activists of the nationalist movement "Right Sector" together with the Voluntary Ukrainian Corpus [or “DUK” – from Ukr.] representatives who have just returned from the frontline, made an opposition event to the bugger gathering that toke place in "Kinopanorama", Kyiv cinema, on October 31, 2014.

In spite of the fact that we are now being in the state of war, numerous bugger organizations financed from abroad don’t even plan to stop or freeze their activities and carry on making propaganda. In particular, on October 31 those degenerates arranged to show the film "Max and others" in one of the capital’s cinemas "Kinopanorama", the purpose of the event is obvious: convincing viewers that sexual perversions are now considered the norm.

The anti-event to this sodomy conducted by the “Right sector" on October 31 was effective. After a small visit of nationalists organizers of the bugger propaganda evening changed their mind refused to show that anti-Christian film.

However, public reaction on the nationalistic opposition action was ambiguous. It is clear that all decent people supported nationalists; however, there were some degenerates who sentenced them.
Well, nationalists have long been operating in accordance with the Eastern proverb, "The dog barks, the caravan proceeds to go". Despite liberal barking nationalists are eager to continue fighting and resistance to the destructive ideas that come to us from the West. Thank God, we have strength to take up arms and defend our land from neobolshevyks attacking us in the east of Ukraine, and we are strong enough to punish officials who abuse the people, as well as to resist bastards that fight against the remnants of our people’s morality and try to impose perverted norms on us.

неділя, 5 жовтня 2014 р.

Russia Insists on Strengthening Anti-Fascist Legislation

Modern Russia is a member of most European globalist organizations. Participating in ll these associations it fully agrees on anti-fascist mythology postulates which are an integral part of modern liberalism. Moreover, Russia is often seen to be in favor of strengthening legislation aimed at struggling with nationalism. 

On September 30th at the PACE (Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe) session in Strasbourg debates took place aiming to adopt a new resolution on "neo-Nazism". Main reporters were Marietta Pourbaix-Lundin and Olga Kaakova, representatives of Sweden and Russia respectively. Both speakers insisted that the so-called "neo-Nazism" should be equated with "right extremism". The Russia representative was persistently assertive concerning blaming Ukrainian Waffen SS Division "Galicia". 

Russia's position is not surprising, because the current Putin’s regime considers nationalism completely unacceptable. Any manifestations of Russian nationalism are severely persecuted. In addition, Moscow is aware that its imperial interests are in danger because of nationalist movements in Eastern Europe.

Reference: The division "Galicia" was formed in 1943 being an initiative of Ukrainians loyal to the Third Reich as well as Ukrainian Catholic representatives and moderate Ukrainian politicians. The Ukrainian Nationalists Organization (UNO) did not support the idea of creating such a division as it considered their enemy to be not just the USSR but also Germany. Nevertheless, UNO did not take an active resistance to the establishment of the division.

The main motivation of volunteers from the Division "Galicia" was the desire to protect their homeland from Bolshevism. Division soldiers showed great heroism during the Battle of Brody (in fact, while German troops were demotivated it was the Ukrainian Division that offered the greatest resistance to the Bolsheviks). Afterwards the soldiers from the Division fought against communist partisans in Slovakia and Yugoslavia (Ukrainian soldiers concluded an informal peace agreement with Joseph Tito’s partisans while fighting in Yugoslavia).

четвер, 18 вересня 2014 р.

“The Right Sector” will participate in Parliamentary elections

 On September, 13, the political party “The right Sector” had a meeting. It took place at the camp of the 5th battalion of Ukrainian Voluntary corps (DUK) that lies not far from the frontline. The political party “The Right sector” is formally independent from Ukrainian Voluntary corps (DUK) named “The Right Sector” due to one peculiarity: according to some Governmental restrictions political parties are forbidden to have their own troops. But it happened that both party and Ukrainian Voluntary corps (DUK) are two elements of the same system. 

It didn’t take much time to carry out the private meeting. Questions under consideration were personnel policy as well as taking the decision to participate in the elections. 

After the meeting the names of TOP-10 party members were announced. 

The list is led by Andryy Tarasenko, a well-known “Stepan’s Bandera Trident” (“Trysub”) member representing the organization for many years. He is now one of several leaders of “The Right Sector”. He has nowadays been hospitalized due to a serious injury. 

Some more people presenting TOP-10 are the following: 

Olena Bilozerska, a journalist and a blogger who has been providing strong informational support to right wing movements in Ukraine for many years. She was deprived of a popular international award because of her nationalistic point of view. Olena is currently an avarage soldier of the 5th battalion of Ukrainian Voluntary corps (DUK). 

Olena Karpiyk, one of “The Right Sector” founder’s wife. Her husband has been kidnapped by The Federal Security Service. 

Rostyslav Vynar, an old participant of “Stepan’s Bandera Trident” (“Trysub”), a leader of “The Right Sector” in Dnipropetrovsk region, Central Ukraine, and a social and political journalist known for traditionalist works. 

Petro Ivanyshyn, DPhil, professor, the so-called “literature fascist” (according to the words of a couple of liberal minded intellectuals) because of his “homophobic” viewpoints as well as strong critic of liberalism, feminism, postmodernism and westernization. 

 “The Right Sector” Ukraine leader is going to run for a deputy in one of the frontline majority districts. 

To be frank, we must confess “The Right Sector” will definitely face some hardships on its way to Parliament. De facto, “The Right Sector” is the only powerful political structure fully independent from any oligarchs. The major income of the party is given to cover organization’s needs (weapon and transport purchase, medical treatment etc.). Nevertheless, the party’s leaders are sure that participation in the elections will consolidate achievements of the nationalist movement. 

середа, 27 серпня 2014 р.

CasaPound Italia support Ukraine

Dear readers! (Editor’s letter)

We are sorry to inform that the web-site you are currently on hasn’t published any new materials for a long time due to the fact that its creators have been actively participating in the notorious events in the East of Ukraine. For this reason we feel an urge need to report you about all the latest events in Ukraine. 
Ukrainian people continue to fight against Moscow's occupation. Our struggle against Russian imperialists seems now to be a struggle for the preservation of the Ukrainian nation. For many years of Ukrainian independence it has been a neo-colonial power that betrayed our interests for benefit of Moscow and the West. This power has deprived Ukraine of nuclear weapons and has systematically destroyed the Ukrainian army. That is what Moscow imperialists were hoping for. But our enemies have made a mistake: their aggression led to our national spirit “recovery”. The whole Ukrainian nation is now consolidated to struggle against one common enemy. 

The current regime led by Poroshenko isn’t acting in a consecutive manner. To say more, there are lots of traitors on the highest levels of Ukrainian government and in the army. Unfortunately, Ukrainian nationalists are not able to fight on two fronts at the same time as struggle against the internal enemy would definitely bring benefits to invaders. But we must say that there is one good thing concerning this issue. One may easily observe nowadays a sincere revolutionary mood of Ukrainians. “The Right Sector” is becoming more and more popular among frontline soldiers every new day of our struggle. A lot of soldiers and officers are frank in their words about the time after defeating the Russians when they are eager to go and fight with the Kyivan traitors and are going to carry out a military coup together with nationalists. 

European Anti-Fascists Actively Supporting Russian Invasion into Ukraine

The Neo-Bolshevik terrible mess taking place in Eastern Ukraine is being actively supported by European anti-fascists who felt the danger of the nationalist regime establishment in Ukraine. That is why they could not but reveal their solidarity with the Communists who are the main pro-Russian force in Donbas.

Italian anti-fascists are especially active in this process. What is more, Spanish anti-fascists even ventured to send several military volunteers to Ukraine to declare their support.

понеділок, 7 липня 2014 р.

No Gay Parade in Kyiv thanks to nationalists’ threats

On Saturday, July 5, there had to take place a rally named "Equality march". It was to be organized by local LGBT activists. Perverts in Ukraine are hesitant to organize public gay parades so this was the latest attempt to carry out a more modest public meeting. However, even this action seemed to be impossible for them to organize because Kyiv police claimed it was absolutely unprepared to protect perverts from possible nationalists’ attacks. According to one of the police heralds nationalists would have a substantial quantitative advantage in the case of street clashes. Moreover, they could be armed. After such news LGBT activists couldn’t help refusing to carry out what they had planned to.

The fact is that nationalists were seriously preparing to counter perverts indeed. Despite the fact that many Kyiv nationalists are nowadays fighting in the East of Ukraine, there were still quite a lot of activists in the capital presenting nationalist organizations willing to disrupt the "Equality march" even if it would have been under strong police protection. In order to support their comrades, those fighters who were training at the battalion "Azov" came back to Kyiv. The "Rights Sector" representatives stated that in the case of "Equality march" conduction there would be people punished for that action, and those are not only organizers but also some officials and politicians helping to carry out the event.

What is worth emphasizing is that THIS is the 3rd perverts’ attempt to carry out a public meeting of that kind in the Ukrainian capital. The 1st attempt took place in 2012. In order to resist degenerates a great number of young nationalists from all over the country came to Kyiv. An impressive quantity of nationalistic power gave an opportunity to take the whole city under control (taking into account residential settlements too). Therefore perverts rejected the idea of the "humble gay parade". Nevertheless, several LGBT movement representatives were still beaten. 

Unfortunately, perverts succeeded to carry out their small public meeting in 2013. Mind that the campaign was accompanied by extremely strong support from the police, including Special Forces named "Berkut" (literally “Golden eagle”). Nationalists failed to break through the numerical police borders. The event organization was in fact agreed at the highest level as the Ukrainian President of that time (Victor Yanukovych) led a policy of rapprochement with Brussels (it should be noted that Yanukovych was the most loyal to the LGBT movement among the other presidents). 

Nowadays the main nationalist forces are aiming to resist Russian invaders in the East. However, nationalists do not stop fighting against all the dangers that are spread through totalitarian liberalism of the West.

вівторок, 10 червня 2014 р.

A traditionalist session: Kyiv traditionalists met for the 2nd time

The 2nd meeting of a newly established Centre for Social and Humanities Research named “Traditionalist perspective” took place on Wednesday, June 4, in Kyiv. The event was held in a seminar format.

The topic of the 2nd “Traditionalist Perspective” seminar, namely “Is authoritarianism worth being afraid of?”, was rather provocative but undoubtedly urgent for Ukraine these days. The participants of the event were the following: Sergiy Shumylo (the Head of the International Centre for Humanitarian Initiatives), Olexandr Maslak (PhD, Associate Professor of Philosophy Center for Humanitarian Education in the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine), Sergiy Kapranov (PhD, senior researcher at the Institute of Oriental Studies), Oleg Odnorozhenko (PhD, an active leader of the nationalist movement), Eduard Yurchenko (Philosophy lecturer, co-founder of the Ukrainian Traditionalist Club), Ihor Zahrebelnyi (philosopher, writer, member of the Scientific and ideological Centre named after Dmytro Dontsov, Philosophy department advanced student of Poltava National Pedagogical University), Olena Semenyaka (Ukrainian Traditionalist Club coordinator, advanced student of the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy), Ihor Garkavenko (philosopher, social activist), Andriy Topchiy (historian, “Facty” (“The facts”) journalist) and some others.

Eduard Yurchenko gave a speech hitting some issues related to the “Traditionalist Perspective” activities and emphasizing the importance of authoritarianism for the current situation in Ukraine. The main stress was made upon the idea that the Ukrainian state should be based rather on the legacy of the Ukrainian Pavlo Skoropadsky State, not on the heritage of the UPR (The Ukrainian People's Republic). 

Seminar participants definitely agreed on the view that the Skoropadsky state is a much more attractive historical benchmark than the UPR being “leftist” by its nature. The matter of concern was recognition of Skoropadsky’s state-building achievements and the fact that his state was considered just as a right but not a left project. One more good point was a need to pay more attention to OUN (The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists) authoritarian traditions, the general problems of authoritarian power and a “sober” analysis of the current realities. Concerning the last issue Eduard Yurchenko noticed that the idea of a strong authoritarian government is becoming popular among intellectuals and ordinary citizens who expect it to ensure the expected order in the country.

All the participants were unanimous in one point: the continuation of the revolutionary struggle must be finished in the authoritarian dictatorship installation which is necessary just to preserve the independence of Ukraine, the assertion of its subjectivity, the destruction of the criminal-oligarchic regime of internal occupation as well as the launch of a project aimed at preserving national identity and cultivation of specific European values and traditions.

The main subjects of the revolutionary process should be those who now defend the independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, i.e. volunteer nationalists, other patriots and some military organizations.

The seminar ended with a discussion of some technical issues and prospects of the “Traditionalist perspective”. Ukrainian intellectuals representing the right nationalist-conservative wing of a public stream should form a clear revolutionary discourse presenting a program that offers bold ideas to our society, including those ones that perhaps cannot be expressed by our politicians.

пʼятниця, 16 травня 2014 р.

Dmytro Yarosh : Caravan should move on…

There is such Eastern proverb: “dog barks, but caravan moves on. During last years of the existence of Independent Ukraine, this proverb inspired me and many of my blood brothers. We moved on.. We walked the way of National revolution. Moved to our dream, Ukrainian Independent Common State. Dogs barked, snarling jackals, but we did our work 2013 brought to us great award for all our efforts. Our society began to realize the basic truth – only red-black flag will lead us under blue-yellow flag of liberty. Ideas, which we, nationalists, proclaimed many years, has been perceived by critical mass of Ukrainian citizens and this resulted to the real revolution development in Ukraine. But, at the same time, we must realize the fact, that National revolution has not won yet.

Imperial Kremlin panicky afraid of the creation of Ukrainian national state. That is the reason of it”s reaction with aggression. Unfortunately, we still have to implement only defensive war, protect our sovereignty and territorial integrity. Aggression of Moscow a little bit suspended revolutionary processes and saved oligarch system, allowed the new power to act impertinently, save from lustration those, who were guilty before the Ukrainian publicity, did not allow to finish the revolutionary process with juridical and political finish of the national idea'as the base of Ukrainian state creation.

If we had no any factors of aggression from the Moscow, in this case the street would say it”s powerful word, revolutionary element must create concrete political yields, and the society, united by revolution, would create all actions of the new power.

But, we have many facts to be glory in. We many facts be optimistic. First of all, in winter 2013-2014 the revolution of consciousness took place. Now we have another society, than we had a year ago Revolutionary struggle led us to the powerful changes, which will be potential many decades. Our society became closer to the national ideas. At the same time our society realized it’s own responsibility of the creation it”s own history. Ukrainian society now understands, that it must strictly establish all demands to the existing power, and in case of the ignoring of such demands - the existing power can be replaced.

There was another positive change – the positional strengthen of national movement. We were capable to unite to the single revolution force different levels, oriented to the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism. Recently, those levels of society were displaced by neo-colonial obstacles. But now, “Right Sector” is one of the most important factors of the state living. “Right Sector ” is uncomfortable for many people, but we exist and affect many processes, because we are based on the right ideas and ideals, sacrifice of oufr membership and the support of population.

It is very important the fact of military force growth in the national movement. “Right Sector” appeared in Ukrainian history in the night of October the 30, defending “student” Maidan against brutal goblins from “Berkut”. Weapons of those fellows for that time was simple wooden sticks (not even sticks, but pieces of wooden logs) and canned peas. Several months passed, stakes in the struggle grew, but “Right Sector” become the real revolutionary army, hardened during those street encounters. After Yanukovich escape we were capable to create the system of professional training or fighters and now those fighters effectively encounter armed saboteurs from Moscow.

With regard to that fact, the “Right Sector” had to adapt to the new political conditions and become the political party, we accurately choose methods how to encounter with aggressors from Moscow. Unfortunately, the acting power does not promote the ability to use full potentiality of nationalists in in the struggle for the unity of the country. But, despite, we managed the cooperation, and for this time our fellows coordinate thei efforts with state force agencies, defending national interests as on the “front line”, as in the deep “rear”.

Those our fellows, who encounter saboteurs from Moscow in Donbass or guard state border somewhere in Rivne region, - they are the confidence of our future. The best of them will head national movement and, probably, in some time, will head political life in Ukraine. They are those people, who estimate honor and defense of national interests higher than their security and own prosperity. Unfortunately, there are some persons in our power with psychology of traders and bank owners. With the kind assistance of God, The National revolution in Ukraine will win and we will obtain real national elite - not only professionals, but sacrificial people with virtues of knights.

Our “caravan” moves on. The question about the victorious finish of National revolution is still the objective and will be the primary question. That is why - we will win. And God will assist us!

Russian multiculturalism policy threatening the occupied territories of Ukraine

Modern Russian Neostalinizm cannot be considered better than Western cultural Marxism. The Russians in fact are now suffering from the same misfortune as the nations of the European Union do. Neostalinizm regime headed by Putin is now implementing a policy of multiculturalism which leads to complete dissolution of Russians in a sea of Asian people.
An event taking place in the Pushkino town not far from Moscow on May 15-16 is a striking manifestation of the Kremlin’s official policy. An immigrant murdered a young Russian man that led to a wave of protests against both migrants and local authorities protecting them. But all these protests faced resistance of the police and their complete misunderstanding. 

The current Russian government is pursuing genuine Russian patriots but is willingly “granting” protection to immigrants at the same time. Drug trafficking and several other criminal spheres are under migrants’ control. Moreover, many (even too many) representatives of Asian nations have their lobby in the police offices and in government authorities.

Russian multiculturalism policy brings significant threats to Ukrainian society. 

Firstly, one may easily observe a significant percentage of Asians representing Russian occupational forces on the Crimean peninsula as well as in the East of Ukraine. Those were Asians who were actively participating in raping local white girls and women, as well as in banditry occasions in the Crimea. 
Secondly, after the Crimea had been occupied we could observe an influx of Asians establishing control in the area of business (tourism in particular). 

Occupied territories of Crimea have all the chances to become a new Stavropol. Stavropol is a territory lying in the North of the Caucasus Mountains. It is a homeland to Ukrainians and Russians (but the local Ukrainian population is mostly denationalized: a part of is identifying itself as neither Ukrainians nor Russians but the "Cossack" people). Due to the policy of the Russian government Stavropol has turned into the Russian Kosovo. Stavropol territories are now being massively occupied by Muslim Caucasians despising the indigenous population. The Crimea can now easily become a new victim of the same Russian imperial multiculturalism approaches.

Thus the current struggle against Russian invaders is for Ukrainian nationalists not just a fight for independence, but also the one for the entire white race’s interests!

вівторок, 13 травня 2014 р.

Dmytro Yarosh: Interview to Italian journalists

1. What is the present social and political situation in Ukraine?

Everything is quite tough. Even before Yanukovych came to power, we said that our country is occupied from the inside. Under the rule of Yanukovych, the anti-national nature of this regime reached its climax. Currently, after Yanukovych escaped, one can see cracks in the regime – but the regime itself has not been completely removed. The Party of the Regions and the Communist Party are not banned. Yesterdays opposition (parties) are not helping fight against corruption. There is no movement towards more justice and solidarity in society. 

2. What do you think about the new government in Ukraine (the interim government)? 

Originally, we tried not to criticize the new government to avoid destabilizing the situation in Ukraine. Now, however, we are forced to state the obvious: the interim government has demonstrated a completely lack of professionalism and patriotism. This can be seen clearly by the loss of Crimea, the ongoing presence of corruption, and the completely lack of any resistance towards internal and external enemies. Certain elements in the current government have become completely contra-revolutionary. The national revolution, in any case, must continue. Of course, it would be best if it continued in a peaceful form. But the current government, with its deeds can easily provoke a new wave of uprisings. 

       3. What do you think about western supporters of the Ukrainian uprising, like Soros or Bernard-Henri Lévy or even Obama? (some say the revolution was financed by western politicians, like Soros, Bernard-Henri Lévy or Obama). What do you think about this?

Soros, Bernard-Henri Lévy, or Obama were not at all interested in a national revolution in Ukraine. The west was interested in protests that would force Yanukovych change his geopolitical course. It’s obvious that effort was put towards this. Yet despite this, western countries viewed Yanukovych as the legitimate president even when people were dying on the streets on Kyiv. Bernard-Henri Lévy has certain ideological interests regarding Ukraine, while Soros has both ideological and economic interests. Obama, despite being from the democratic party, thinks through the scope of the imperialist interests of America. Not one of them wants to see a strong Ukrainian state. 

4. What do think about NATO and the EU? Is the Ukrainian revolution pro-EU, pro-western? What do you think about America? 

We are against membership in the EU or NATO. We have nothing against working with EU and NATO countries on equal terms. Yet giving up our sovereignty by joining one of these blocks is something we do not want to do. In the same sense, we want nothing to do with the ideology that currently dominates in the EU. We also don’t want to associate ourselves with imperialistic politics of NATO. The revolution that took place in Ukraine was, above all, cause by hate of ordinary citizens towards a corrupt and criminal government. Certain illusions regarding the EU might have played a slight role, but this role was always secondary. Today we, Ukrainian nationalists, are trying to push forward the view that Ukraine should not rely in the EU or NATO, but on itself. Unfortunately, Putin hinders our propaganda and makes promoting such views hard. Putin is by far the biggest promoter of pro-EU and pro-NATO moods in Ukraine –his own imperialistic politics force Ukrainians to look towards the west. On the other hand, the policies of western countries has been ruining the illusions of many Ukrainians. Because the west is doing nothing against Russia in terms of pressure, many Ukrainians have became disappointed in the west. Regarding America, we  do not have some type of pathological hate to it – yet we are completely aware that it wants world domination, and we are against this. We are for a multipolar world, a world without empires, a world where every nation can be free and preserve its own identity and spirituality. 

6. What type of political and cultural views do you have? (i.e. what do you not like, which politicians do you view as positive examples?). If you could describe the worldview of Right Sector in a few words, what would you say?

We support the ideology of classic Ukrainian nationalism and through this ideology try to find answers to modern-day issues. In this sense, we remain true the this ideology that was formed towards the middle of the 20th century, but also want to continue to develop it and transform it to present-day issues. The absolute base of Ukrainian nationalism is Christianity. We clearly differentiate nationalism from things such as chauvinism, xenophobia and imperialism. The heart of our movement is composed of people with nationalist views, people true to conservative Christian values. Quite often it is people filled with the noble spirit of the Middle Ages. Together with this, we’re ready to find answers to modern problems, ready to help society find answers to different social, economic and other problems.

7. Is your revolution against the Russian people, the Russian government or pro-Russian Ukrainians? What type of future do you want for Russian-speaking Ukrainians?

Our revolution, above all, aims to defend only the interests of our own nation. Regarding Russia, we’re against Russian imperialism. The fact that we have many Russians inside Right Sector quite clearly shows we’re not Russophobic. These people came here to support the Ukrainian revolution and gain experience. They also completely understand that the Putin regime is actually anti-Russian. Many Russian patriots have been thrown in jail for their activities. Russians are degrading morally and physically and inside Russia are being lost amongst a sea of non-Russian peoples. It’s quite possible that the next president of Russia can be the Chechen Ramzan Kadyrov. This is why many Russians understand that the only thing that can save their nation is destroying the empire. We work with such Russians and will continue to do so. Regarding Russian-speaking Ukrainians, then many of our activists are Russian-speaking Ukrainians are true Ukrainian patriots. Russificiation, however, is indeed a problem. An even more serious problem of similar nature exists in Ireland. We want the rebirth of Ukrainian culture and language, not through repression, but through art, through promotion. This will only become possible when we obtain a true national state.

8. What do you think regarding Crimea and the recent referendum there regarding separating from Ukraine? 

We feel that Crimea belongs to Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars. Besides this, many other ethnic minorities live there – not only Russians, but also Greeks, Armenians, Estonians and so forth. This is why we want to create a true autonomous region in Crimea, that being integrated fully with the rest of Ukraine, would still guarantee the rights of Crimean Tatars and other ethnic minorities. Theoretically, the main argument for the creation of such an autonomy is the pro-Ukrainian position of Crimean Tatars. Regarding the so-called referendum, it was a complete farce. Less than 30% of the population of Crimea took party on it. This pseudo-referendum took place underneath Russian guns. Sooner or later Kyiv will regain full control of Crimea. 

9. You say you want an independent and sovereign Ukraine. If you came to power tomorrow, what type of foreign policy would you have? What geopolitical goals do you have for Ukraine? Should Ukraine join any international alliances? What type of relations will such a Ukraine have with Russia?

We see a few chances for consolidation and integrating countries of central and eastern Europe. First of all, it is the creating of a vertical axis from the Baltic to Black Sea with the Baltic countries, Belarus, Poland and Ukraine. Second of all, we’re interested in seeing consolidation between the countries in the Black Sea region and countries in the south Caucasus region. In many aspects, we are prepared to be pragmatic in finding allies. Regarding Russia, then we can have normal relations with this country only when it gets rid of its imperialistic ambitions. 


пʼятниця, 9 травня 2014 р.

Congratulations to the Polish people on note of the canonization of POPE JOHN PAUL II from Right Sector

We sincerely congratulate all Poles on note of the canonization of John Paul II - a great pastor of the Universal Church and a great son of the Polish people. One can take different views on the politics of John Paul II. But, beyond any doubt and discussion are his holiness, his dedication to God and his love to people. "Santo subito!" - "Immediately a Saint!" – chanted crowds of people at his funeral.  Hundreds of millions of followers of the Universal Church from the entire world were waiting anxiously for the start of the beatification process, and after for the canonization of this great Christian leader. The proclamation of John Paul II as a Saint filled the entire Church with happiness. Even more happiness was brought to the Polish people, which the Pope was a member of.

Ukrainians and Poles have a tragic history. However, recent events give us hope of being able to not repeat the mistakes of the past and together build the future. It is impossible not to mention how Poles showed such solidarity with our people during the revolutionary events. The support we felt can be a sign of the decisive reconciliation of our peoples and preparation for close co-operation and friendship in the future.

We, Ukrainian nationalists, are interested in co-operation with Polish conservative and nationalist forces and in friendly relations between our nations overall. We are interested in integration processes on the territory between the Black and Baltic seas and view Poland as our strategic partner. Our peoples must forget any chauvinism and build relations on positions of mutual respect. I hope John Paul II himself will pray for this in Heaven.

The Right Sector calls upon all Poles to remain true sons of the Church and to remain their national and religious identity. Together we'll revive Europe – a Europe of free nations!

субота, 12 квітня 2014 р.

Dmytro Yarosh: National State is the guarantee of freedom, justice and prosperity for every citizen

In the late autumn of 2013 a national revolution has been started in Ukraine. Because of the activities of the Yanukovych's criminal regime Ukraine was on the verge of collapse, and its people suffered from iniquity, safe will of officials and from material shortadges. Going into violent confrontation with the people, resulting in the death of hundreds of Ukrainian citizens Yanukovych regime nevertheless has been defeated. However the shameful flight of Yanukovych and his closest accomplices, "changing colors" by the members of the Party of Regions and the rise to power of former opposition do not mean that the National Revolution has won. Today the national revolution must be continued by peaceful methods and this prompted me to propose myself a candidate for President of Ukraine."Right Sector" has published my official election program. Now I want to turn to the community to present some of the principles that I will realize, if I become the President:

1. National state: through the implementation of the strategic interests of the Ukrainian nation to the guarantee of rights and freedoms for every citizen.

Every nation, including the Ukrainian is a community of the dead, the living and the unborn, it is the unity of past, present and future, it is the memory of the ancestors, it is the care about contemporarie andthe responsibility for the fate of future generations. A national state should exist to implement the strategic interests of each nation. At the moment Ukrainians do not have such state — many things have beed put to the foundation for the existence of the present Ukrainian state but not our national idea, not the strategic interests of our nation. This situation has to be changed; there must be a state on Ukrainian land, which will live up the testaments of our ancestors, take care of the present interests of Ukrainian society and secure a great future for our descendants.

Only Ukrainian national state could provide a decent life for every Ukrainian citizen regardless of nationality. It has developed so historically, that Russians and Poles, Belarusians and Hungarians, Greeks and Gagauz, Armenians and Georgians, as well as representatives of many other minorities live next to Ukrainians on Ukrainian land. The most of them like the Ukrainian country and respect its indigenous inhabitants. Proof of this is the fact that Belarusians, Armenians, Russians, Poles stood, fought and died on Maidan next to Ukrainians. The creation of the national state implies attention to the extensive interests of each good citizen. Respecting the rights of the titular nation, the representatives of minorities not only facilitate their economic and social interests, but also create conditions for implementation their own national rights.

2. Solidarism is the key to social and economic fairness in the country.

The existence of Ukrainian independent state was accompanied by the establishment of criminal-oligarchic regime, which parasited on the sweat and blood of Ukrainian citizens, led to extreme social differentiation, robbed not only society but also the state. However, the recent developments in Ukraine made oligarchs aware that their influence is not absolute. The situation in Ukraine has been modified a bit and the oligarchs have adapted to these changes; however, the entire oligarchic system was not eliminated.

We are not opposed to the existence of people in Ukraine who concentrate large business resources and monetary assets in their hands. But these people do not have the right to: a) get rich at the expense of the vast majority of the population and the public interest; b) impose their own rules on political game. In order not to lose everything they possess, local oligarchs should share their wealth with public and the state, invest in the development of Ukrainian economy using their foreign assets and get rid of excessive political ambitions. There is no other way for the peaceful solution to the problem of oligarchy.

If simplified taxation system and some mechanisms for business promotion must be developed for small and medium size businesses, big companies must be accompanied by a system of progressive taxation: the more you get, the more you pay. Excess profits should be directed not to the personal pocket, for purchasing new estates for billions of dollars, but to the state treasury for social programs, as well as to production modernization. This must be be the first strategic step towards building a solidarity society.

The level of personal wealth must depend on natural abilities, education, initiative, hard work. Anyone having the appropriate skills, should pave the way to increased prosperity. But every Ukrainian citizen regardless of financial capabilities must know that all basic interests are secured. It is about the right to free education, healthcare, and abot ensuring the appropriate level of material needs.
On the one hand social programs have to solve the real problems of some population segments, on the other hand they must not contribute to social groups that parasite on the work of others, receiving social benefits without working.

3. Instead of the dictatorship of economy, the philosophy of responsibility, duty and care.

Throughout human history, material factors played an important role in the life of peoples, countries and civilizations. This is quite natural. However the absolutisation of these factors is an unnatural and harmful phenomenon. Such phenomenon we can see all around the world now and particularly in Ukraine. Under oligarchic regime, which ruled and largely continues to dominate in Ukraine, this absolutisation has got particularly degenerate forms as clannish economic interests were assigned to the basics of entire state system functioning.

We recognize the importance of economic factors in the life of state and society, however, oppose to the absolutization of these factors. We state that not a society, state or individual must serve the economy but the economy should serve the implementation of ultimate goals. This is why we advocate for the responsible voluntarism as opposition to the extreme economic determinism.

Strong political commitment, the self-devotion of people filled with high ideals, belief in themselves, combined with patriotic feelings can perform miracles, they can reach goals, which seemed impossible yesterday. So we advocate for the economic policy resulting from the strategic interests of the Ukrainian nation and which will be not restricted by patterns and schemes that now seem secure. This is a policy that puts domestic and foreign economic activity in the service of state interests, its independence and the defense, which do not exclude responsibility for the fate of the environment, which cares for the harmonious development of society and individual. This policy requires first-class specialists - technocrats in the public and private sectors, however, these technocrats must obey the strategic objectives standing in front of the nation.

4. The National State is impossible without effective mechanisms of democracy.

Both external invaders and the representatives of internal occupation regime benefited from keeping Ukraine in the iron grip of excessive centralization, bureaucracy and the lack of transparency. In our turn defending a strong and responsible state we also stand for the implementation of effective mechanisms for national democracy. We know that "good" government is not that, which consists of "good people", but that one which is under constant control of people combined by national idea.

In this regard, we support the election of judges and district police officers, the strict accountability of deputies of all levels to the voters and the possibility of their impeachment, lessening the bureaucracy of government and empowering local administrations. The distribution of administrative powers and responsibilities between public authorities and governments should be done in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity: the state should not interfere in the areas of public life in which the community itself can cope.

5. “Ukrainecentrism” as the basis of geopolitical doctrine.

Without a real national state, Ukrainians were the object and not the subject of world politics. Both ruling parties and opposition in particular found themselves in Russia – West coordinate system for more than twenty years of independence, explaining that Ukraine must either be with Russia, or with the West, or to be a buffer zone between these two geopolitical powers. We reject this neo-colonial approach and defend Ukraine centered view of the prospects in Ukrainian geopolitics.

Ukrainian geopolitical doctrine should be based on multidirectional approach, the search for the maximum number of allies in our multipolar world, and on creation of own geopolitical center. We stand for friendly relations with our neighbors and thus emphasize the importance of integration processes in the following areas: 

a) the creation of Baltic - Black Sea axis with the participation of Baltic states, Poland, Belarus and Ukraine; 

b) the reactualization of GUAM's geopolitical lines with the prospect of bringing Armenia and Black Sea countries to it (in other words - focus on the unity of the Black Sea and Caucasian countries); 

c) the establishment of the most close relations with all countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

In the Middle Ages, Ukraine was one of the most powerful states in Europe. Our goal is to restore that greatness of our country.

6. Raising the level of defense capabilities is one of the main directions of state policy.

Existing as neocolony, Ukrainan state pursued a policy of disarmament and the destruction of own army. Instead, the establishment of Ukraine as a truly independent national state and a strong geopolitical player requires immediate action to revive the defense capabilities. Therefore, it is extremely important radical turn in the attitude of the state towards its own army.

The residual principle of army financing, which took place in the past, must be replaced by funding in accordance with actual needs. The rearmament must be accompanied by forced development of the defence industry. Ukraine has enough technologies and experts, we just have to learn how to use them effectively.
Notable personnel changes should be conducted in the army and all law enforcement agencies focused on the criteria of professionalism and patriotism. An incapable person or disloyal to the Ukrainian state must not be allowed to wear officer's marks. However after lustration the state must make every reasonable effort to raise the social prestige and material wealth of Ukrainian soldiers. In particular, it is the urgent task to solve the housing and living problems of soldiers and raise their wages.

A general militarization of society is important for the increase of the country's defense. Therefore, it is necessary to create territorial self-defence forces like in Switzerland, but on a voluntary basis, and to permit acquisition, possession and carrying of firearms by responsible members of society.

Governmental support to youth paramilitary groups who rely on clear national and patriotic principles can be of importance for the growth of the country's defense capabilities.

пʼятниця, 11 квітня 2014 р.

De-Communization goes on: in the City of Rivne "Right Sector" evicted Communists and threw away busts of Stalin

On April 11, the public has stopped work of Rivne Regional office of the Communist Party. The organizers of the rally were local "Right Sector" and civil activists. Protesters demanded closing down the CPU and return of the room in which the offices of the party are located to the local authorities. The activists took out of the party office books, newspapers, portraits of Marx, Lenin, busts of Lenin and Stalin.

According to the organizers of the action, portraits and busts will be handed over to the museum. Literature and printed periodicals were immediately burnt down in the yard of the house. The room is sealed, and there were hung nameplates on which it is stated that it is "under protection of 'Right Sector''

"Right Sector" will continue fighting with Moscow puppets and servants of the oligarchic regime. Criminal communist ideology and any communist organizations should be prohibited and its main functionaries who have harmed the Ukrainian people - punished.

четвер, 10 квітня 2014 р.

Ivan Solodovnyk: Internal occupation regime continues acting. In the environmental area - as well...

The fact that the national revolution is not over, and the internal occupation regime is not removed completely was stated many times. However, looking at some moments of the current socio-political reality, it seems that recent events were not even the beginning of the National Revolution, but only its rehearsal. Too far is the current regime from taking care of national interests, too blatantly behave current officials...

Both the Parliament and the interim government have repeatedly demonstrated their anti-people stance. Once again it happened on April 9. Read the message of UNIAN: "Parliament passed a law on April 9, which changes or liquidates procedures for granting permits for most activities that affect the environment. In favor of decision voted 270 deputies. According to the press service of "National Ecological Centre of Ukraine," the law "On Amendments to certain legislative Acts of Ukraine on reducing the number of permit documents" simplifies cutting down the reserves and construction in the forests. The subject of the submission of the bill is the former president Viktor Yanukovych."

So what do we have? "Post-revolutionary" MPs vote for the bill proposed by the former dictator Yanukovych. But this is not the crux of the problem, but the fact that this bill is aimed at ensuring the interests of pleb-elite at the cost of destruction of national wealth. Who benefits from enacted on April 9th law? Scum who wants to make money out of deforestation and "trust fund babies" interested in living in clean and scenic lands. Concern for environmental protection and revival of ecology? Social justice? Public access to national wealth? Why would pleb-elite care about it? Their main landmark is egoism, pursuit of those private interests, and for the interests of society they "don't give a damn". And this is at best...

Nationalism offers a completely different approach to environmental issues or to any other public interest issues. For the nationalist all that owns the nation is a gift of God, and, therefore, it is not only a right but also a duty. Hence - a special attitude to the national wealth, with which nature has endowed us. Rightly wrote on this subject one of the ideologists of Ukrainian nationalism, the founder of "Tryzub" Vasyl Ivanyshyn. Based on the fact that "the environment - is primarily health of present and future generations," Ivanyshyn formulated the following maximum program: "Our task - to stop the destruction of nature and create the conditions for its restoration and to leave the environment for our descendants in better condition than that in which we live." Unfortunately, the current "political elite" is very far from that logic...

Generally, the impudence of the current pleb-elite leads to the conclusion that the Heavenly Hundred was not enough to change the country. Perhaps we need to sacrifice a few more hundreds? But preferably not people, but the incumbents...

Several hundred citizens of Lviv with chainsaws demanded resignation of city officials

This morning at the Lviv City Council a community of the city and representatives of Right Sector held preventive action about unlawful destruction of Snopkivskyj park.

"On March 27 in the park were cut down 83 trees, of which only eight were deadwood. A part of them was burnt in place to cover up their crimes," said the deputy of the head of the Lviv regional organization "Right Sector" Vitaly Sergatyuk. - The workers referred to the act of 2012, where were recorded 64 trees throughout the whole park that needed cutting, but were cut down only in one place. The workers themselves told us that they were preparing the area for construction."

Activists demand resignation of the officials who gave the orders for the destruction of trees - Director of Urban Development of Lviv City Council Andriy Pavliv, Head of Environment and Landscaping Andriy Galushka and a director of state enterprise "Park High Castle" of Lviv communal enterprise "Green Lviv" Roman Protsakevych.

вівторок, 8 квітня 2014 р.

Communism must die

Oath of the participant of Maidan

In late November last year in Ukraine has started the national revolution. It began with questionable slogans and equally questionable behavior of the "leaders" of Maidan. But then everything went the way that was suggested by nationalists, and people started demanding resignation of Yanukovych's Party of Regions and ban of the Communist Party, the fight against corruption, lustration, and complete reload of power. Yanukovych fled, at the cost of blood of our heroes other people came to power in Ukraine. However, most of our demands are not fulfilled. Corruption schemes are restored and enhanced, lustration is not done, guilty of mass murders instead being brought before the revolutionary tribunal serve the present regime. In the power structures operates the fifth column of the Kremlin. Ukrainian patriots are killed and thrown in jail. The government is afraid of its own people and tries to disarm it.

The national revolution has not won yet. And so every Ukrainian patriot must promise himself that he won't stop the struggle. Otherwise, our sacrifices will be in vain.

Given this "Right Sector" initiates nationwide campaign "Oath of the Participant of Maidan." Let everyone who came out to the streets and squares of our cities with the hope of a better Ukrainian tomorrow swears to his own conscience and before God that he will not betray the idea of Revolution. Privately or collectively, at home or in church, at Maidan or in the streets of our own cities let us swear this oath and let us be true to its words!

I, - name, surname - realizing my own responsibility before the Lord, before the blood of the fallen heroes, before my own conscience and Ukrainian people swear:

I will go out to Maidan again or use other methods of struggle if the government continues to ignore the revolutionary demands.

I will go out to Maidan again or use other methods of struggle if the government does not punish the murderers and will instead persecute the patriots.

I will go out to Maidan again or use other methods of struggle if the government does not abandon criminal intentions to disarm its own people and by negligence or deliberate sabotage finally destroy country's defensive potentialities.

I will go out to Maidan again or use other methods of struggle if the authorities go the way of signing the international agreements that restrict Ukrainian sovereignty, inflict a blow on national security, and turn Ukraine into an obedient puppet of Moscow or Western imperialists.

I understand that "good" is not the government that "consists of good people," but one that is under the constant supervision of the united by the national idea people. May the Lord helps me to perform the duties that I take over.

Inscription: "Here, at this place, on 18.02.2014, I should have died, but destiny gave me a second chance. I swear to live the rest of my life worthily."

The communists were defeated in Mykolaiv.

In the night of April 8 the activists of the Right Sector together with other Ukrainian patriots dispelled the pro-Russian demonstration in Mykolaiv, one of the region centres in the South of Ukraine.

The local Communists and Russian "tourists" set up a tent camp in the end of February and regularly organized anti-Ukrainian separative actions. The local government and the police didn’t interfere or even tolerated the actions.

In the night of April 7 to 8 the patriots decided to put an end to this. They surrounded the Communists' camp and dispelled them, despite the fact that the separatists were supported by the police.

понеділок, 7 квітня 2014 р.

ZARA. Bulgarian ultras support Maidan and Ukrainian Revolution

The Statement "Right Sector" on the Events in the Eastern and Southern Regions of Ukraine

A number of anti-state riots that have occurred and continue to occur in the eastern and southern regions of Ukraine shows that Moscow does not limit itself with the imperialist annexation of the Crimea and is trying to either add to its territory another part of Ukrainian lands, or to force the interim government to make concessions. At the same time, Ukrainian authorities have shown a lack of will, which borders on outright sabotage. Because of this we have lost Crimea and risk losing the southern and eastern regions of the country.

Police that previously served Yanukovych regime, today ignores crimes of Russian saboteurs and so-called "separatists." Moreover, it often becomes the enemy of Ukrainian statehood. It happened in Kharkiv where MIA arrested not armed separatists that attacked the office of "Right Sector," but its defenders. Realizing the danger of further destabilization in the country, "Right Sector" did not go the way of fighting on two fronts (against the "separatists" and against MIA). However, in response to this we received only further toleration of the actions of the enemies Ukrainian statehood. It seems that the management of the MIA acts directly in favor of the interests of the Kremlin.

In this regard, we call on the Acting President of Ukraine O.Turchynov, Prime Minister of Ukraine A. Yatseniuk and the Supreme Council (Verkhovna Rada) to take urgent action to stabilize the situation in the eastern and southern regions of our country. We are ready to confront the enemies of our country in close cooperation with government authorities; however, if the state government continues to demonstrate criminal inaction, we will fight on our own.

All structures of "Rights Sector" should be maximally mobilized, so that they could at first signal begin active counteraction to the so-called "separatists."

Also we call all Ukrainian citizens to support our position and not to believe provocateurs who urge to paradoxically view resistance to the aggressors as "action in favor of the Kremlin."

The Political Council of "Right Sector"

субота, 5 квітня 2014 р.

Peter Ivanyshyn: Nationalism and the right political power: ideological perspectives of the Right Sector

The national Revolution of 2013-2014 definitely demonstrated that there isn’t any other alternative than national liberation struggle for the oppressed people. And at the forefront of this struggle against the regime of internal occupation the core of which was the criminal system of Yanukovych, there was and there is the Right sector – the civil formation which, upon the intiative of the All-Ukrainian organization "Tryzub" n.a. S. Bandera, united quite different social and political structures, as well as individual citizens of the right and nationalists’ movement. Therefore, the Right Sector has earned respect and affection of millions of Ukrainians whose national feelings were awakened.

The first revolutionary phase which ended with the escape of Yanukovich and change of power in February 2014, was naturally dominated by "fighting against" - against the anti-people, anti-Ukrainian and anti-state government. However, at this time there appeared the demand in the second stage of the revolution, which has to finish the whole process and lead to the qualitative change of the system of power for the benefit of the people. At this stage the "fight for" will prevail, because the freedom from the regime of Yanukovych does not mean freedom of Ukraine. And it is clear that a great chance to win will belong to the political and social movement, which will have a dictinct own philosophical basis and will be based on the eternal and fundamental ideological realities that have been for ages determining the fate of both the individual and entire nations.

To such great, fateful, traditional realities, known from the Bible or from the history of the ancient Greeks and Romans, belongs the ideology of nationalism as basic social philosophy (or system of ideas), and as a particular political ideology (or doctrine), which determines the activity of social movements and organizations. 
What is in fact Ukrainian nationalism? This is a nation centric ideology. This is ideology of national freedom, the freedom of nations and individual. This is the idea and the act for the name of Ukraine. This is the ideology of protection, preservation and self-determination of the Ukrainian nation. Therefore, it is much wider and more effective than patriotism as love for motherland, though originally springing out of this feeling.

The system of Ukrainian nationalism is ancient, large and complicated, its latest images and definitions were poetically expressed by the genius of Taras Shevchenko in the middle of the nineteenth century, with powerful summarizing of historical experience and philosophical traditions of the Ukrainian people. Therefore, the basic elements of this system are very simple and organic for Ukrainian mindset, they are not artificial and not borrowed from another ideology. Let’s outline some of them.

First of all, the Ukrainian nationalism offers to everyone to step on the "Ukrainian way." Ukrainian way is a continuation of age-old ideological and political struggle for the Ukrainian idea of goal. It is a struggle for state self-determination of Ukrainians in all spheres of life. This is the Ukrainian way of life.

Therefore, the national idea is first of all the idea of winning, strengthening and developing of the national state - the state of the Ukrainian nation on the Ukrainian territory, which would guarantee the development for the Ukrainian nation, and full freedom, justice and prosperity to all citizens of Ukraine. Ingenious literary formulation of the Ukrainian national idea was given by Taras Shevchenko: "In his own house one has his own truth, and the power, and the freedom."

As a family wants to have their own house in order to be happy, so are the people eager to have their own state. Therefore, the national state is "a natural desire of every developed nation, is the culmination of its political self-determination, due to which it becomes a full and sole master of its fate in their own land" (V. Ivanyshyn). But the national state does not act only in the interests of ethnic Ukrainians, it also secures the rights and freedoms of all honest citizens of Ukraine, loyal to Ukrainian statehood.

The system of national democracy is dominant in a national state. Which is not only the legal system of prevailing role of indigenous people in state development and functioning, but also systematic control by its citizens over the power.

The nation thus is considered as something broader than the concept of nation (ethnos) and as something impossible to replace with the cosmopolitan notion of "political nation" (mechanical association of citizens). In fact, a nation is a conscious and effective unity of people, united by the idea of freedom, based on ethnic and social, spiritual and cultural factors.

An important part of the nation focused ideology is nation-existential, Shevchenko-like thinking. It's about thinking in terms of security, development and reproduction of the nation, based on the national categorical imperative or order. This order was very well articulated by Ivan Franko: "Everything that goes beyond the frame of the nation is either hypocrisy .. or fruitless sentimentalism of fantasts."

Having clear national ideological orientations, it’s easy to compete and to fight against unprincipled political entities, which are in a great number present in both current and past ruling parties; to expose the falseness of imperialism as the non-freedom mindset, enslavement of peoples and individuals which lays behind the ideology of liberalism or communism; to refuse from futureless demonstration of racism, xenophobia or pseudonationalism.

Moreover, the clear national ideological dominant allows to lead quite reasonable and flexible purely political and social activities. This relates to the development, on the base of the Right Sector, of the party and public formation of the right direction, which would be able to combine not only the nationalist forces, but also various conservative and even national-democratic structures, as well as hundreds of thousands of politically uncertain, but the patriotic citizens of Ukraine. And you can do it based on the national Shevchenko’s ideas, based on traditional Ukrainian philosophy, based on patriotic feeling, which has been awakened as a result of revolutionary events as well as due to the recent occupation by Moscow. Thus, the Right sector can unite on its nation centric state platform all patriotic and state-oriented people of different beliefs, areas of residence, language, age and sex groups, who are able to grow to the Ukrainian idea and who want the power of people in Ukraine, and not the power over the people.

The Right sector will forever remain in the history of Ukraine as the main driving force of the National Revolution of 2013-2014. However, the Right Sector can have even a large historical mission as a political party and civil organization. It is the completion of the National Revolution, change of the government system, the development of the Ukrainian National State - home for all citizens of Ukraine. I believe that a strong reliance of the Right Sector on Shevchenko’s national idea, on the Ukrainian nation-centrism, on state thinking and mechanisms for national democracy will allow to realize this age-old dream of the Ukrainian people.

"Russian" soldiers in Crimea...

One of "russian" soldiers in Crimea. What do you think about Putins multiculti regime?

вівторок, 1 квітня 2014 р.

The UPA Commander-in-Chief's son and the famous rock musician are the "Right sector" members

During the election meeting of the "Right sector" party carried out on March 22 the core composition of a new-born political party was elected. Two outstanding representatives of the Ukrainian national movement have become inter alia several leaders of the "Right sector". They are Yuri Shuhevich and Arseniy Klimachov, the latter better known as Arseny Bilodub.

Yuri Shuhevich is the son of one of the leaders of Ukrainian Nationalists, notably the UPA Commander-in-Chief Shukhevych (1907-1950). Yuri was born in 1933. In the year 1945 he was e facto arrested. Yuri Shuhevich was forcibly kept in a children's home. His mother and grandmother were also arrested. Later, because of his refusal to renounce the father and condemn the nationalist movement Yuri Shuhevich spent nearly thirty years in Soviet prisons and concentration camps.

Arseny Bilodub is a vocalist of a legendary nationalist rock group "Sokyra Peruna" ("Perun's axe"). One more active participant the "Right sector" is a famous nationalist poet Diane Kamlyuk.